<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hulu Considering Charging For Internet TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.worldtvpc.com/blog/hulu-considering-charging-for-internet-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.worldtvpc.com/blog/hulu-considering-charging-for-internet-tv/</link>
	<description>Internet tv movies free tv and online tv shows blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:37:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Netflix To Benefit From The Exodus of Hulu Viewers &#8211; If They Charge</title>
		<link>http://www.worldtvpc.com/blog/hulu-considering-charging-for-internet-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-2707</link>
		<dc:creator>Netflix To Benefit From The Exodus of Hulu Viewers &#8211; If They Charge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldtvpc.com/blog/hulu-considering-charging-for-internet-tv/#comment-2707</guid>
		<description>[...] Could Netflix benefit from the exodus of Hulu users when they start charging for content? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Could Netflix benefit from the exodus of Hulu users when they start charging for content? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alun</title>
		<link>http://www.worldtvpc.com/blog/hulu-considering-charging-for-internet-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-2000</link>
		<dc:creator>Alun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 22:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldtvpc.com/blog/hulu-considering-charging-for-internet-tv/#comment-2000</guid>
		<description>No No No No Noooooooooooooooooooo...

Dont make me go back to the shitty pirate sites. I WILL NOT pay to watch tv online. Sorry guys</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No No No No Noooooooooooooooooooo&#8230;</p>
<p>Dont make me go back to the shitty pirate sites. I WILL NOT pay to watch tv online. Sorry guys</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://www.worldtvpc.com/blog/hulu-considering-charging-for-internet-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-1990</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldtvpc.com/blog/hulu-considering-charging-for-internet-tv/#comment-1990</guid>
		<description>Its a false economy. The current advertisers pay what they pay because of the huge traffic Hulu get. Start charging and the traffics gonna do what??? Yeah die...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a false economy. The current advertisers pay what they pay because of the huge traffic Hulu get. Start charging and the traffics gonna do what??? Yeah die&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hulu dont do it</title>
		<link>http://www.worldtvpc.com/blog/hulu-considering-charging-for-internet-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-1989</link>
		<dc:creator>Hulu dont do it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldtvpc.com/blog/hulu-considering-charging-for-internet-tv/#comment-1989</guid>
		<description>This cannot be happening!!!

Why dont they just charge advertisers more rather than us poor mugs??

I think Hulu would go down the pan just like Napster if this were to occur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This cannot be happening!!!</p>
<p>Why dont they just charge advertisers more rather than us poor mugs??</p>
<p>I think Hulu would go down the pan just like Napster if this were to occur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muchos</title>
		<link>http://www.worldtvpc.com/blog/hulu-considering-charging-for-internet-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-1988</link>
		<dc:creator>Muchos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldtvpc.com/blog/hulu-considering-charging-for-internet-tv/#comment-1988</guid>
		<description>There is no need for Hulu if it costs.
There are loads of content providers out there giving us what we want for free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no need for Hulu if it costs.<br />
There are loads of content providers out there giving us what we want for free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudi</title>
		<link>http://www.worldtvpc.com/blog/hulu-considering-charging-for-internet-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-1987</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worldtvpc.com/blog/hulu-considering-charging-for-internet-tv/#comment-1987</guid>
		<description>The only way on earth i would pay is if they lose all the ads. Its the only way that iTunes and Amazon can have a pay model. But the big problem is that there are loads of other places to find streaming content for free and ad free. They are just going back to the bad old days imo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only way on earth i would pay is if they lose all the ads. Its the only way that iTunes and Amazon can have a pay model. But the big problem is that there are loads of other places to find streaming content for free and ad free. They are just going back to the bad old days imo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

